Singapore News Channel, Singapore News Network

The United States is removing nearly two dozen Saudi military students from a training program and sending them back to Saudi Arabia following after an investigation into a deadly shooting by a Saudi aviation student at a Florida navy base last month, Attorney General William Barr said Monday.

Many of the 21 cadets had contact with child pornography and possessed jihadist or anti-American material, Barr said. None is accused of having advanced knowledge of the shooting, which Barr said was motivated by �jihadist ideology� and has been classified as an act of terrorism.

The 21-year-old Saudi Air Force officer, 2nd Lt. Mohammed Alshamrani, opened fire at the base in Pensacola, killing three U.S. sailors and injuring eight other people. The Justice Department has been investigating the incident as an act of terrorism.

Officials have said Alshamrani hosted a party before the shooting, where he and others watched videos of mass shootings. The gunman had also apparently taken to Twitter before the shooting to criticize U.S. support of Israel and accuse America of being anti-Muslim, another U.S. official told the AP last month.

Alshamrani, who was killed by a sheriff�s deputy during the rampage at a classroom building, was undergoing flight training at Pensacola, where foreign military members routinely receive instruction.

The December shooting raised questions about how well international military students are screened before they attend training at American bases.

More here

More Iranians who were brutally murdered by the Khomeinist regime during the November protests are being identified.

In November 1,500 democracy protesters were slaughtered in the streets of Iran by the brutal and wicked Khamenei regime.

This weekend, after the regime finally admitted to shooting down the Ukrainian passenger plane earlier this week, thousands of brave Iranians took to the streets to protest the regime. These brave protesters take to the streets knowing they may face death for standing against Khamenei.

There was an AMAZING display at Besheshti University� Protesters REFUSED to step on the US and Israeli flags!

More/Video

A report reveals some disturbing trends in the abortion business.

There are approximately 710 abortion facilities in the United States and 245 of them dispense the chemical abortion RU486, the take-home abortion method that has killed at least 24 women and sent 4,000-plus to hospital emergency rooms with serious problems, in some cases,

�Medication abortion clinics are on the rise,� says Cheryl Sullenger of Operation Rescue, �and I think we do need to do more to put restrictions on the distribution of abortion drugs.�

More

Salisbury units operating on N. Salisbury Blvd. and Pine Way on an MVC with power lines and pole damaged. The vehicle cut off a pole and collided into 5 new Jeeps. Power will be out for a period of time while crews replace the pole.

MSNBC political pundit Joy Reid said racists and white supremacists can express themselves more freely in America with Donald Trump as president.

“People are afraid of, not just what he can do, but what he is doing to people, what he is bringing out in people,” Reid said during her Sunday show, later continuing, “You have swatting happening, and Nazis walking around. It is a scary time.”

Reid, an outspoken critic of Trump, often spends hours of airtime on her weekend show highlighting racially-charged incidents of violence against minorities and often draws connections between violent ideological outbursts and Trump’s rhetoric.

More

A total of 90% of Mexican nationals disapprove of President Trump’s push to build a wall along the southwestern American border, according to a new study released by the Pew Research Center.

Respondents in more than 6 out of 10 countries in a worldwide poll said they opposed the construction of a wall, with the majority of respondents of Latin American nations saying they are against it.

“Across the 33 nations polled, a median of six-in-ten disapprove of building a wall on the border of the U.S. and Mexico, one of Trump�s well-known campaign promises,” the study said.

More

Trump officials justified a new effort to roll back the Obama administration’s pro-union “joint employer” rule by arguing that it would have hurt not only businesses but also workers. The Trump administration said the controversial rule would have reduced real income by $11 billion a year.

The Labor Department announced Sunday that it was formally replacing the Obama rule, which said that businesses could be held liable for workplaces at another business if they had “indirect control” over the latter. The administration restored the pre-Obama standard, which said liability only applied in cases of direct control, and added further clarification.

“When we lift the heavy hand of government and allow businesses to create jobs, enter new markets, and compete at lower prices, every American wins,” wrote Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney in a Wall Street Journal op-ed. Citing the White House Council of Economic Advisers, they stated that the Obama-era rules imposed annual net costs of $5 billion and reduced incomes by $11 billion.

More

There is a credibility crisis for Western governments. For too many years, their incompetence and deceit have forced ordinary citizens to question whether they produce more harm than good. On both sides of the Atlantic, the governing elite play by a set of rules that separates them from those they govern. They ignore popular discontent while placing themselves above the law. It is in this volatile climate that they push the greatest con game ever concocted: man-made global warming. This is the hubris that brings empires crashing down.

Like any confidence scheme, global warming rests entirely on misdirection and bad faith. While Western governments create hundred-trillion-dollar programs for fighting the weather, they have (1) never scientifically established that man’s use of hydrocarbon energy causally leads to temperature change of any kind, (2) never articulated some baseline climate ideal for the planet, and (3) never produced a cost-benefit analysis detailing the loss in human life and standard of living required in order to impose upon the world the type of global command-and-control economy necessary to restructure all industry and commerce. These three pillars are so fundamental that a normal person could be forgiven for assuming they’ve long ago been calculated. That’s part of the con.

The science isn’t settled. Nobody has decided whether to green the Sahara or bury Scandinavia in more snow, whether we’re pursuing the Roman Warm Period of two thousand years ago or the Little Ice Age that ended in the nineteenth century. No government has admitted that the Green Dream will destroy populations and make modern conveniences future luxuries for only the wealthiest survivors. How do you convince your citizens you have their best interests at heart when nothing could be farther from the truth? You prey on their weaknesses with a three-tailed hustle on a global scale.

More